Today I copied some passages from an old notebook that once belonged to my maternal grandmother, why did I copy them? Because when I saw them I realised that my nan was not the sweet old lady I remembered…
The Law as it should be.
One evening after the theatre, two gentlemen were walking down the avenue when they observed a rather well-dressed and attractive lady walking just ahead of them. One of the men turned to the other and remarked “I’d give fifty dollars to spend the night with that woman.”
To their surprise the young lady overheard the remark and turning round she said, “I’ll take you up on that.” She had a neat appearance and a pleasant voice, so bidding his companion good-night the man accompanied the lady to her home, where they immediately went to bed.
The following morning, the man presented her with twenty-five dollars and prepared to leave. She demanded the rest of the money, stating, “If you don’t give me the other twenty-five dollars, I’ll sue you for it.” He laughed saying, “I’d like to see you get it on those grounds.”
The next day he was surprised when he received a summons ordering his presence in court as the defendant in a law suit. He hurried to his lawyer and explained the details of the case. His lawyer said “She can’t possibly get a judgement against you on such grounds, but it will be interesting to see how her case is presented.”
After the usual preliminaries, the lady’s lawyer addressed the court as follows:
“Your Honour, my client, this lady here, is the owner of a piece of property, a garden spot surrounded by a profuse growth of shrubbery, which she agreed to rent to the defendant for a specified length of time for the sum of fifty dollars. The defendant took possession of the property, used it extensively for the purpose for which it was rented, but upon evacuating the premises he paid only twenty-five dollars, one half the amount agreed upon. The rent was not excessive since it was restricted property, and we ask judgement be granted against the defendant to assure payment of the balance.
The defendant’s lawyer was impressed and very amused at the way his opponent had presented the case. His defence, therefore was somewhat altered from the way he originally planned to present it.
“Your Honour,” he said, “my client agrees that the young lady has a fine piece of property, that he did rent such property for a while, and a degree of pleasure was derived from the transaction. However, my client found a well on the property, around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft and erected a pump, all labour personally performed by him. We claim these improvements to the property were sufficient to offset the unpaid amount, and that the plaintiff was adequately compensated for the rental of the said property, we, therefore, ask that no judgement be granted.”
The young lady’s lawyer came back with this:
“Your Honour, my client agrees that the defendant did find a well on the property and that he did make improvements such as my opponent has described. However, had the defendant not known the well existed; he never would have rented the property. Also, upon evacuating the premises, the defendant removed the stones, pulled out the shaft and took the pump with him. In doing so, he not only dragged his equipment through the shrubbery, but left the hole much larger than it was prior to his occupancy. Making it easily accessible to little children. We, therefore, ask that the judgement be granted.”
AND SHE GOT IT……
My nan had as dirty a mind as anyone and I will show this in more excerpts from her notebook, so keep an eye out for them!
Mantha 🙂